USPTO serial 73582966
WISE BUY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITAKER, LAURIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WISE BUY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | POWDERED LAUNDRY DETERGENT, LIQUID LAUNDRY DETERGENT, AUTO DETERGENT, DISHWASHING DETERGENT AND FABRIC SOFTNER | ABANDONED | Jan 6, 1983 |
| 016 | DISPOSABLE DIAPERS, PAPER NAPKINS, PAPER TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE, FACIAL TISSUE AND PLASTIC WRAP | ABANDONED | Jul 13, 1983 |
| 022 | PLASTIC KITCHEN TRASH BAGS, PLASTIC FOOD STORAGE BAGS, AND PLASTIC TRASH BAGS | ABANDONED | Jun 5, 1984 |
| 029 | CANNED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, APPLESAUCE, CANNED BAKED-STYLE BEANS, CANNED BEANS WITH PORK, COFFEE CREAMER, SALAD DRESSINGS, JELLIES, FRUIT PRESERVES, NON-FAT DRY MILK, SALAD OIL, VEGETABLE BASED SPRAY FOR USE AS NON-STICK COATING FOR COOKWARE, PEANUT BUTTER, DRY ROASTED PEANUTS, PICKLES, SHORTENIG, FLAKE COCONUT AND POTATO CHIPS | ABANDONED | Apr 12, 1982 |
| 030 | BREAKFAST CEREAL, FLOUR, KETCHUP, MACARONI, MARSH-MALLOWS, MIXES FOR MAKING BAKERY GOODS, ENGLISH MUFFINS, MUSTARD, NOODLES, PEPPER, PRETZELS, RICE, SALT, SPAGHETTI SAUCE, SPAGHETTI, CHOCOLATE SYRUP, PANCAKE AND WAFFLE SYRUP, TEA BAGS, VENEGAR, CHOCOLATE CHIPS, MACARONI AND CHEESE, RELISH AND CORN CHIPS | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1983 |
| 031 | PET FOOD AND ANIMAL LITTER | ABANDONED | Jan 25, 1984 |
| 032 | FRUIT JUICE DRINKS CONTAINING WATER, CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS, GINGER ALE, FRUIT JUICES, CONCETRATED FROZEN JUICE, VEGETABLE JUICES AND FRUIT PUNCH | ABANDONED | Aug 11, 1983 |
| 042 | RETAIL SUPPERMARKET SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RED OWL STORES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SUPER VALU STORE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WISE BUY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |