USPTO serial 73584386
IRIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERSKINE KATHRYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IRIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE AS A REAL ESTATE MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |