USPTO serial 73585002
SKYKID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1548861Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 25, 1989
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKYKID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ EDUCATIONAL COMPUTER PROGRAMS ON CARTRIDGES, TAPES, DISCS AND INCORPORATED IN ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | [ TOY ROBOTS, ] GAME CARTRIDGES AND [ DISCS, ] VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES [ AND HAND-HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING AN ELECTRONIC GAME ] | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA NAMCO
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA NAMCO
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA NAMCO
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SKYKID
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 25, 1996 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 10, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |