Drawing for THOM'6 THOMSON INFORMATIQUE SERVICES

USPTO serial 73585080

THOM'6 THOMSON INFORMATIQUE SERVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THOM'6 THOMSON INFORMATIQUE SERVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROLAND PLOTTEL

30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ 20TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10112-0025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND MANUALS SOLD AS A UNITABANDONED—
016COMPUATER PROGRAM MANUAL; BOOKS, MAGAZINESK, PAMPHLETS AND NEWSLETTERS ON COMPUTERS AND DATA PROCESSINGABANDONED—
035DATA PROCESSING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL RECORD KEEPING AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENTABANDONED—
037MAINTENANCE, INSTALLATION AND INSTALLATION SUPERVISING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS AND DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMSABANDONED—
038ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICESABANDONED—
042COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES; AND COMPUTER TIME-SHARING SERVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 1988ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 31, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 9, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 1986ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 2, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance