Drawing for NORTRAK

USPTO serial 73591029

NORTRAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NORTRAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007INSTRUMENTS FOR SENSING AND MEASURING DIRECTION OF DRILLING TOOLSABANDONEDFeb 26, 1986
009MEASURING INSTRUMENTS USED IN WELL DRILLINGABANDONEDFeb 26, 1986
042ENGINEERING SERVICESABANDONEDFeb 26, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 1988PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Apr 5, 1988PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 4, 1988ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 1987NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Sep 18, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 18, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 26, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 24, 1986NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Jul 1, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance