USPTO serial 73592452
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NETRONIC STANDARD SOFTWARE SCHMITZ GMBH
AACHEN, DE
Other trademarks owned by NETRONIC STANDARD SOFTWARE SCHMITZ GMBH
D-5100 AACHEN, DE
NETRONIC STANDARD SOFTWARE SCHMITZ GMBH
AACHEN, DE
Other trademarks owned by NETRONIC STANDARD SOFTWARE SCHMITZ GMBH
NETRONIC STANDARD SOFTWARE SCHMITZ GMBH
AACHEN, DE
Other trademarks owned by NETRONIC STANDARD SOFTWARE SCHMITZ GMBH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS USED FOR GRAPHICAL DEPICTION OF DATA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 1994 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 8, 1994 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |