USPTO serial 73592702
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CONWAY, NH
DURHAM, CT
DURHAM, CT
TRENTON, NJ
TRENTON, NJ
TRENTON, NJ
CONWAY, NH
CONWAY, NH
DURHAM, CT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK A ROESLER
MARK A ROESLER BAKSER & HOSTETLER10500 CROSSPOINT BLVDINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46256-3331UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | CERAMIC MUGS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2001 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 20, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 3, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |