Drawing for MACHO COMBOS

USPTO serial 73597060

MACHO COMBOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROWE, ROBERT J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MACHO COMBOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES H. SCHWARTZ

CHARLES H SCHWARTZ ROSTON & SCHWARTZ5900 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1430LOS ANGELES, CA 90036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANT SERVICES OF PROVIDING MULTIPLE COMBINATIONS OF FOOD ITEMS ON ONE PLATEABANDONEDMar 16, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 25, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 23, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Oct 25, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Oct 9, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 28, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 7, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 4, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 12, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 5, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance