USPTO serial 73597060
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES H. SCHWARTZ
CHARLES H SCHWARTZ ROSTON & SCHWARTZ5900 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1430LOS ANGELES, CA 90036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES OF PROVIDING MULTIPLE COMBINATIONS OF FOOD ITEMS ON ONE PLATE | ABANDONED | Mar 16, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 23, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 25, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 7, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 4, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |