USPTO serial 73597261
ITI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ITI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | ALUMINUM VEHICLE BRIDGES, PORTABLE METAL BUILDINGS, AND METAL FLAG POLES | ABANDONED | — |
| 007 | WIND TURBINES, ELECTRIC POWER GENERATORS; AND HYDRAULICALLY OPERATED MOVEABLE SWIMMING POOL FLOORS AND SWIMMING POOL BULKHEADS BEING FORMED OF PLASTIC PLANKS ON A METAL FRAME | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | ANTENNA SUPPORTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | RECOVERY, SECURING AND TRAVERSER APPARATUS COMPRISING MOVABLE PLATFORMS, CABLES, HOOKS AND CONTROLS THEREFOR FOR USE IN ASSISTING SHIPBOARD HELICOPTER LANDINGS, AND SHIPBOARD HANGAR DOORS OF METAL | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | CUSTOM FABRICATION OF ALUMINUM AND STAINLESS STEEL STRUCTURES | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL AND AERONAUTICAL PURPOSES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INDAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ITI
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |