Drawing for LEATHER AND TWEED

USPTO serial 73597315

LEATHER AND TWEED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WISEMAN, MICHELLE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEATHER AND TWEED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARSHALL A. BURMEISTER

MARSHALL A BURMEISTER BURMEISTER YORK PALMATIER HAMBY & JONES135 S LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003COLOGNE FOR MENABANDONEDSep 6, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 11, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 11, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 29, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 29, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 19, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 12, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 10, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 26, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 6, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 9, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance