Drawing for SUN-RYPE

USPTO serial 73597931

SUN-RYPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUN-RYPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029DEHYDRATED APPLES; PRESERVED AND FROZEN APPLES; APPLE SEGMENTS; FROZEN CHERRIES; PROCESSED CHERRIES; PRESERVED PEACHES; APPLESAUCE; AND FRUIT PIE FILLINGS; NAMELY APPLE, APRICOT, PEACH, RAISIN, CHERRY AND BLUEBERRYABANDONED
032APPLE JUICE; CONCENTRATED APPLE JUICE; FROZEN APPLE JUICE CONCENTRATE; APPLE JUICE FOR INFANTS; BLEND OF APPLE JUICE AND APPRICOT NECTAR; BLEND OF APPLE AND LIME JUICE; APRICOT NECTAR; APRICOT NECTAR CONCENTRATE; BLEND OF ORANGE AND APRICOT NECTAR; SWEET CIDER; PEAR NECTAR; BLEND OF PEACH NECTAR AND ORANGE JUICE; ORANGE; GRAPEFRUIT JUICE; BLEND OF ORANGE AND GRAPEFRUIT JUICE; RASPBERRY AND PINK GRAPEFRUIT COCKTAILS; AND APPLE, GRAPE ANDABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 3, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 3, 1989EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Dec 12, 1988CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Nov 17, 1988JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 9, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 6, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 13, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 13, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 9, 1987CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 7, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 9, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 17, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 12, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance