USPTO serial 73597931
SUN-RYPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUN-RYPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD H. ZAITLEN
RICHARD H ZAITLEN SPENSLEY, HORN, JUBAS & LUBITZ1880 CENTURY PARK ESTE 500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | DEHYDRATED APPLES; PRESERVED AND FROZEN APPLES; APPLE SEGMENTS; FROZEN CHERRIES; PROCESSED CHERRIES; PRESERVED PEACHES; APPLESAUCE; AND FRUIT PIE FILLINGS; NAMELY APPLE, APRICOT, PEACH, RAISIN, CHERRY AND BLUEBERRY | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | APPLE JUICE; CONCENTRATED APPLE JUICE; FROZEN APPLE JUICE CONCENTRATE; APPLE JUICE FOR INFANTS; BLEND OF APPLE JUICE AND APPRICOT NECTAR; BLEND OF APPLE AND LIME JUICE; APRICOT NECTAR; APRICOT NECTAR CONCENTRATE; BLEND OF ORANGE AND APRICOT NECTAR; SWEET CIDER; PEAR NECTAR; BLEND OF PEACH NECTAR AND ORANGE JUICE; ORANGE; GRAPEFRUIT JUICE; BLEND OF ORANGE AND GRAPEFRUIT JUICE; RASPBERRY AND PINK GRAPEFRUIT COCKTAILS; AND APPLE, GRAPE AND | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 12, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |