USPTO serial 73598543
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CORNWALL, ONTARIO, CA
CORNWALL, ONTARIO, CA
CORNWALL, ONTARIO, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SYNTHETIC MARBLE-LIKE CHEMICAL COMPOSITE FOR USE AS BATHTUBS, TUB SURROUNDS, SHOWER STALLS, COUNTERTOPS, AND KITCHEN SPLASH BOARDS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 1989 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 1989 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 29, 1988 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |