USPTO serial 73599089
NYGARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NYGARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WILLEMSTAD CURACAO, AN
WILLEMSTAD CURACA, AN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY KLEIN
HENRY KLEIN WANDEROTH LIND & PONACK1750 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | LADIES' CLOTHING, NAMELY JACKETS, SKIRTS, BLOUSES, TOPS, PANTS, PANT SUITS, SHIRTS, COATS, SWEATERS, TUNICS, HOUSECOATS, JUMPERS, JEANS, CORDUROY TROUSERS, T-SHIRTS, VESTS, TANK TOPS, CULOTTES, TUNICS, SUITS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1998 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 25, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |