USPTO serial 73599397
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LARRY K. ROBERTS
LARRY K ROBERTS ROBERTS AND QUIOGUE660 NEWPORT CTR DR STE 1400NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE SERVICES | ABANDONED | Oct 10, 1979 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1991 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 10, 1988 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |