USPTO serial 73599416
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SHELTON, CT
INRANGE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
MUSKEGON, MI
SHELTON, CT
SHELTON, CT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT R HUBBARD
ALLEN J. BADEN EDGE LAW GROUP236 N Santa Cruz Ave Ste 228Los Gatos, CA 95030-7279UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTELLIGENT CHANNEL SWITCHES USED IN THE PATH BETWEEN THE CHANNEL OF A MAINFRAME COMPUTER CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT AND A CONTROL UNIT, TO BACKUP AND BALANCE DATA TRAFFIC LOADS, EXCLUDING LOW SPEED TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK SWITCHES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 1991 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |