USPTO serial 73599817
EB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERSKINE KATHRYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GORDON D. COPLEIN
GORDON D COPLEIN DARBY & DARBY, PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEPHONES; MICROPROCESSOR-CONTROLLED TELEPHONE SETS; MICROPROCESSOR-CONTROLLED AUTOMATIC ALARMS CONNECTED TO TELEPHONE SETS; TELEPHONE PARTS, NAMELY LOUDSPEAKERS, CONNECTORS AND DECONNECTORS; VIDEO TEXT TRANSMITTERS/RECEIVERS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS UNITS FOR USE WITH COMPUTERS; PAY TELEVISION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT FOR HANDLING SUBSCRIBER DATA AND ENCODER FOR ENCRYPTION OF VIDEO AND DATA SIGNALS; SUBSCRIBER DECODER; PAY TELEVISION SETS; COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; CRYPTOGRAPHIC COMPUTER TERMINALS; MICROPROCESSOR CONTROLLED TERMINALS; FOR ENCRYPTION OF ALPHANUMERICAL TEXT AND DATA; MICROPROCESSOR-CONTROLLED REPEATERS FOR DECODING GYROMAGNETIC TRANSMISSION SIGNAL; TELEMETRY COMMAND CONTROLS; COMPUTERIZED SIGNAL CONTROLS AND DATA ALARMS FOR WATER AND SEWAGE SYSTEMS; LAND-MOBILE RADIOS WITH COMPUTERIZED CONTROLS AND COMMANDS | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 1, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 11, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |