Drawing for LAURIN PUBLISHING CO., INC.

USPTO serial 73599902

LAURIN PUBLISHING CO., INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CIPPARONE, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAURIN PUBLISHING CO., INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD A. FLYNT

RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN1225 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016CATALOGS, NEWSLETTERS AND MAGAZINES RELATING TO THE LASER AND OPTICS INDUSTRIESABANDONEDFeb 19, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 16, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 26, 1988EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 6, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 7, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 19, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 19, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 24, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance