USPTO serial 73599948
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK P. PRESTA
FRANK P PRESTA LAUBSCHER, PRESTA AND LAUBSCHERSTE 300 FILE 11173745 TWENTY-THIRD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | MORTAR FOR CERAMIC TILES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |