Drawing for ISHISTAR

USPTO serial 73600127

ISHISTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ISHISTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007FARM MACHINERY NAMELY, PLOUGH, DRIVING MACHINE FOR DIGGING AND CULTIVATING, HARROW, SEEDER, COMPOST DISSEMINATOR, LIQUID FERTILIZER DISSEMINATOR, POWDER-TYPE FERTILIZER DISSEMINATOR, CULTIVATING AND WEEDING MACHINE, MOWING MACHINE, GRASS COLLECTING MACHINE, HAY BALER, FORGE HARVESTER, MOWER CONDITIONER, CORN HARVESTER, FEED CUTTER, AND TRAILERABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 1989ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 23, 1989OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 21, 1988OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
May 24, 1988PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 22, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 17, 1988CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 18, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 31, 1987CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 5, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 13, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 10, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 11, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 1, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance