USPTO serial 73600127
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | FARM MACHINERY NAMELY, PLOUGH, DRIVING MACHINE FOR DIGGING AND CULTIVATING, HARROW, SEEDER, COMPOST DISSEMINATOR, LIQUID FERTILIZER DISSEMINATOR, POWDER-TYPE FERTILIZER DISSEMINATOR, CULTIVATING AND WEEDING MACHINE, MOWING MACHINE, GRASS COLLECTING MACHINE, HAY BALER, FORGE HARVESTER, MOWER CONDITIONER, CORN HARVESTER, FEED CUTTER, AND TRAILER | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |