USPTO serial 73601356
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEPHONES; TELECOMMUNICATION SWITCHBOARDS; VIDEOTEX TERMINAL; TELETEX TERMINAL; ELECTRONIC TRANSMITTERS; TELECOPIERS; ELECTRONIC WRITING BOARD; TELEVISIONS; SATELLITE RECEIVER; SATELLITE TRANSMITTER/RECEIVER; MICROWAVE AMPLIFIERS; MICROWAVE CONVERTERS; SATELLITE ANTENNA; DATA-PROCESSORS; COMPUTER AND PERIPHERALS, NAMELY; PRINTER, KEY-BOARD, MONITOR, TERMINAL HARD DISK DRIVE, FLOPPY DISK DRIVE MODEM, DIGITIZER; SALES-MANAGEMENT GAUGES; RADIO AND AUDIO CASSETTE RECORDERS; ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL LENS FOR USE IN CONTROLLING INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT FOR AUTOMOBILES, NAMELY; GAUGES, CRUISE CONTROL, SOUND ALARMS, ANTI-THEFT WARNING ALARMS, BACK SENSORS; SEMI-CONDUCTOR CHIPS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 21, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 1992 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 1987 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 1987 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |