USPTO serial 73601941
EASYL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASYL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
REXDALE, ONTARIO, CA
REXDALE, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONICS APPARATUS, NAMELY; DRAWING AND WRITING PAD HAVING A DIGITIZED OUTPUT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |