Drawing for CHIARO VILLA PIGNA DEI F. LLI ROZZI

USPTO serial 73602760

CHIARO VILLA PIGNA DEI F. LLI ROZZI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CHIARO VILLA PIGNA DEI F. LLI ROZZI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033TABLE WINEABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 1993OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jan 6, 1993ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 6, 1993OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Jul 31, 1992OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
May 12, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 30, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 30, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 5, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 5, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 15, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Apr 8, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 24, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 6, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 21, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance