USPTO serial 73603680
DESERT DESIGNS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1622607Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 1990
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DESERT DESIGNS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOUTH PERTH, AU
SOUTH PERTH, AU
WEST PERTH, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I. PEROFF
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORS OF AMERICA915 BROADWAY 19 THNEW YORK, NY 10010-7108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SKIRTS AND DRESSES, TOPS, JACKETS, TROUSERS, SHIRTS, SHORTS, SWIMWEAR, AND SCARVES; NONE OF THE FOREGOING BEING PATTERNED WITH DESIGNS RESEMBLING A DESERT OR INTENDED FOR WEARING IN THE DESERT EXCLUDING FOOTWEAR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 15, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1996 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 30, 1996 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |