Drawing for IREM

USPTO serial 73603856

IREM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IREM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRE-RECORDED VIDEO TAPES; PHONOGRAPH RECORDS; VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS; AUDIO TAPE RECORDERS; COMPUTERS; COMPUTER DISC DRIVES; COMPUTER DISPLAY AND INPUT TERMINALS; AND PARTS THEREFORABANDONEDOct 15, 1980
028COIN OPERATED (AND NON-COIN OPERATED) VIDEO GAME MACHINES; COIN OPERATED (AND NON-COIN OPERATED) VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISION RECEIVERS OR VIDEO DISPLAY UNITS; COMPUTER GME PROGRAMS, TAPES AND CARTRIDGESABANDONEDOct 15, 1980

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 27, 1990EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 27, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 10, 1989CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Nov 3, 1988CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
May 16, 1988CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
May 9, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 11, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 29, 1988JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 29, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 21, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 1987CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 2, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance