USPTO serial 73604677
PREMIERE DESIGNER KNITWEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PREMIERE DESIGNER KNITWEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | LADIES NATURAL AND MANMADE BLEND KNITTED SWEATERS: PULLOVERS, DRESSES, CARDIGANS, PANTS, SKIRTS, WOVEN T-SHIRTS, BLOUSES,TOPS AND JEANS | ABANDONED | Apr 25, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1989 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 25, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 25, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 17, 1989 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 17, 1989 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 11, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 13, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |