Drawing for FROM SWITZERLAND RICOLA NATURAL HERB COUGH DROPS SOOTHES THE THROAT RELIEVES COUGHS NATURALLY THYME SAGE NEW LINDEN FLOWERS HOREHOUND LEMON BALM PEPPERMINT RICOLA NATURAL HERB COUGH DROPS ANGELICE ROOT ELDER FLOWER

USPTO serial 73604734

FROM SWITZERLAND RICOLA NATURAL HERB COUGH DROPS SOOTHES THE THROAT RELIEVES COUGHS NATURALLY THYME SAGE NEW LINDEN FLOWERS HOREHOUND LEMON BALM PEPPERMINT RICOLA NATURAL HERB COUGH DROPS ANGELICE ROOT ELDER FLOWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1483976Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 12, 1988
Examiner
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with FROM SWITZERLAND RICOLA NATURAL HERB COUGH DROPS SOOTHES THE THROAT RELIEVES COUGHS NATURALLY THYME SAGE NEW LINDEN FLOWERS HOREHOUND LEMON BALM PEPPERMINT RICOLA NATURAL HERB COUGH DROPS ANGELICE ROOT ELDER FLOWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

PETER S REICHERTZ ESQ SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1300 I ST NW 11TH FL EWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005COUGH DROPSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 1, 1984
030HARD CANDY CONTAINING HERBSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 1, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2009CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
May 29, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Sep 1, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Aug 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 16, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 18, 1994C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jan 27, 1994815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Apr 12, 1988R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 19, 1988PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 17, 1987CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 24, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 18, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance