USPTO serial 73604860
HIGH FREQUENCY POWER CONVERSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGH FREQUENCY POWER CONVERSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC P. SCHELLIN
ERIC P SCHELLIN 2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 301CRYSTAL PLZ 1ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING CONFERENCES IN THE FIELD OF FREQUENCY SWITCHING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 1, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 10, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 10, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 3, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 15, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |