USPTO serial 73605426
LIGHTWRITER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIGHTWRITER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BAGSVAERD, DK
BAGSVAERD, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS R. VIGIL
THOMAS R VIGIL THOMAS, VIGIL & ASSOCIATES836 S NW HWYBARRINGTON, IL 60010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PRINTERS, INTERFACES, AND VISUAL DISPLAY UNITS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |