USPTO serial 73611444
S.M.A.R.T.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with S.M.A.R.T.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | UNDERWRITING WARRANTY PROGRAMS FOR WATERBED MATTRESSES | ABANDONED | May 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 17, 1989 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 28, 1988 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Dec 23, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |