USPTO serial 73612100
TERIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TERIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DOWNSVIEW, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATION FOR INGESTION CONTAINING CARBAMAZEPINE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |