USPTO serial 73612452
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DENTAL SUPPLIES - NAMELY, PHOTOSENSITIVE PLATES USEFUL FOR DIRECT LIGHT-CURING OF DENTURE RELINING MATERIALS INCLUDING BONDING LIQUIDS; BRUSH WASHING LIQUIDS COMPRISING BENZENE, TOLUENE AND XYLENE AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS, ACETONE ALDEHYDES AND KETONES, ESTER ACETATE, AND METHYL ACETATE ESTERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | DENTAL PREPARATIONS - NAMELY, PLASTIC ADHESIVES, SOLVENTS FOR VARNISHES, CURABLE UNPROCESSED SYNTHETIC AND ARTIFICIAL RESINS, AIR BARRIER LIQUIDS, ARTIFICIAL TYMPANIC MEMBRANE RESINOUS MATERIALS, ARTIFICIAL TOOTH RESINOUS MATERIALS, DENTAL PROSTHETIC AND FILLING RESINOUS MATERIALS, AND DENTAL CEMENTS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 31, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 1986 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |