USPTO serial 73613664
SOFTPROOF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOFTPROOF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERIZED COLOR GRAPHIC TERMINALS AND WORKSTATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |