USPTO serial 73614386
PRELUDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRELUDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LEDEBERG-GENT, BE
LEDEBERG-GENT, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES N. QUINN
CHARLES N QUINN MILLER & QUINNBROAD & CHESTNUT STS1125 LAND TITLE BLDGPHILADELPHIA, PA 19110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | FITTED SHEETS, QUILTS AND QUILT COVERS, COMFORTERS, PILLOW CASES AND FLAT SHEETS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |