USPTO serial 73614948
THE TARMACS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE TARMACS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | AUDIO TAPES | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER; NAMELY, STATIONERY, WRITING PAPER AND ENVELOPES; NOTEBOOKS; FICTIONAL AND NON-FICTIONAL BOOKS ON DIFFERENT SUBJECTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | JACKETS, COATS, JUMPERS, CARDIGANS, T-SHIRTS, PULLOVERS, SOCKS, TIES, BELTS, SLIPPERS, SHOES, NIGHTGOWNS, NIGHTSHIRTS, SLEEPWEAR, HEADWEAR, UNDERWEAR, PAJAMAS, APRONS GLOVES, SCARVES AND EARMUFFS | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | CHILDREN'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS; RIDE-ON TOYS; TOY ACTION FIGURES; EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING A BOARD GAME; SOFT DOLLS; SOFT PLUSH TOYS; PUPPETS; PUPET STRINGS AND HAND STRINGS SOLD AS A UNIT | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | BISCUITS, CAKES, PASTRY, FROZEN CONFECTIONS, ICE CREAM, CANDY, CHOCOLATES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BARRYCLAIR LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named THE TARMACS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |