USPTO serial 73615420
A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, SPORTSWEAR, LEISUREWEAR, RAINWEAR, SLEEPWEAR AND UNDERWEAR FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, NAMELY--BLOUSES, SHIRTS, SKIRTS, TROUSERS, SHORTS, BERMUDA SHORTS, CAPS, COATS, OVERCOATS, JACKETS, SUITS, TUNICS, DRESSES, TIES, SCARVES, SOCKS, BELTS, HATS, GLOVES, PULLOVERS, SWEATERS, UNDERCLOTHING, STOCKINGS, PANTIES, SHOES, BOOTS, AND SLIPPERS; SMOKING JACKETS, TAILCOATS, BLOUSONS, JUMPSUITS, AND BIKINIS; AND LININGS FOR THE AFORESAID GOODS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |