Drawing for ROYAL VIKING

USPTO serial 73615921

ROYAL VIKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DATRI, ALAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROYAL VIKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029CHEESE, EXCLUSIVE OF FOOD PRODUCTS MADE WITH CHEESE AS A SECONDARY INGREDIENT, SUCH AS PASTRY WITH CHEESE FILLINGABANDONEDJun 20, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 1989ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Feb 28, 1989CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Nov 28, 1988REINREINSTATED
Sep 9, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 1988ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Jul 26, 1988CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Mar 18, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 29, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 1987CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 16, 1987NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Mar 13, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 9, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance