USPTO serial 73616889
CARDINAL INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARDINAL INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | PREFABRICATED OR MODULAR HOMES, APARTMENTS, MOTELS, CONDOMINIUMS, OFFICES, RESIDENTIAL AND CONGREGATE BUILDINGS COMPRISING RETIREMENT COMPLEXES, AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR | ABANDONED | Dec 31, 1958 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 1993 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 31, 1992 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | CU.D | CONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |