USPTO serial 73617982
DACHET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 1990
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DACHET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MARCEL DACHET SPORTSWEAR PTY. LTD.
E. BRUNSWICK, VICTORIA, AU
Other trademarks owned by MARCEL DACHET SPORTSWEAR PTY. LTD.
MARCEL DACHET SPORTSWEAR PTY. LTD.
E. BRUNSWICK, VICTORIA, AU
Other trademarks owned by MARCEL DACHET SPORTSWEAR PTY. LTD.
MARCEL DACHET SPORTSWEAR PTY. LTD.
E. BRUNSWICK, VICTORIA, AU
Other trademarks owned by MARCEL DACHET SPORTSWEAR PTY. LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES M. SLATTERY
JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCHP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22046-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | JEANS, PANTS, JACKETS, SHIRTS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, SHORTS, OVERALLS, DUNGAREES AND COATS; ALL BEING MADE OF COTTON OR DENIM MATERIAL FOR CASUAL OUTERWARE | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MARCEL DACHET SPORTSWEAR PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MARCEL DACHET SPORTSWEAR PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MARCEL DACHET SPORTSWEAR PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named DACHET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 17, 1993 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 20, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 28, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 2, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 16, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 11, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |