USPTO serial 73618635
SOFTWIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERSKINE KATHRYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOFTWIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BEAVERTON, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEAN T. SANDOW
DEAN T SANDOW WAGGONER, CHAPMAN, FARLEIGH, ET AL1515 SW FIFTH AVESTE 770PORTLAND, OR 97201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTERRELATED SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF COMPUTERS AND PERIPHERALS THEREFOR AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR MAPPING THE CONNECTION BETWEEN AN ELECTRONIC TESTING UNIT AND THE OBJECT BEING TESTED | ABANDONED | Aug 29, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1987 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |