USPTO serial 73621217
COLORCLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLORCLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALVIN BROWDY
ALVIN BROWDY BROWDY AND NEIMARK419 SEVENTH ST N WSTE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ANTI-THEFT SECURITY EQUIPMENT-NAMELY, CLAMPS FOR ATTACHMENT TO ARTICLES DISPLAYED FOR SALE WHICH RELEASE A STAINING SUBSTANCE IF RELEASED BY FORCE AND UNITS FOR REMOVING SUCH CLAMPS AT THE TIME OF SALE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |