USPTO serial 73631166
BARCLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BARCLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. LITMAN
RICHARD C LITMAN LITMAN LAW OFFICE LTDP O BOX 15035ARLINGTON, VA 22215-0035UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | CONFERENCE TABLES, SOLD ONLY TO INTERIOR DESIGNERS AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL BUYERS AND ONLY AT OUTLETS ONED BY GF FURNITURE SYSTEMS, INC., D/B/A GF OFFICE FURNITURE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 16, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 8, 1989 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 12, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |