USPTO serial 73635006
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MILO G. COERPER
MILO G COERPER COUDERT BROTHERSONE FARRAGUT SQ SWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PUBLISHING THE MANUSCRIPTS OF OTHERS IN THE FORM OF COMPACT DISCS | ABANDONED | Oct 14, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 12, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |