USPTO serial 73635561
THERMALLOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THERMALLOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VILLERS-SAINT-SEPULCRE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I. WILLIAM MILLEN
I WILLIAM MILLEN MILLEN AND WHITE503 CRYSTAL MALL 11911 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR USE IN INDUSTRY AND SCIENCE, NAMELY SYNTHETIC RESINS CONSISTING ESSENTIALLY OF ACRYLONITRILE-BUTADIENE-STYRENE, (ABS) RESINS, IN THE FORM OF POWDERS, LIQUIDS OR PASTES AS RAW MATERIALS FOR FURTHER MANUFACTURE AND GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | GUTTA-PERCHA, INDIA RUBBER AND BALATA AND FLUORINE-FREE SUBSTITUTES THEREFOR AS RAW MATERIALS FOR FURTHER MANUFACTURE AND GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE; FLUORINE-FREE MATERIALS FOR STOPPING, CAULKING AND INSULATING; MICA AND PRODUCTS MADE THEREFROM | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 1990 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 26, 1990 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 13, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 16, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 11, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |