USPTO serial 73636152
SANOFI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1578429Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 1990
- Examiner
- WHITAKER, LAURIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SANOFI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I. PEROFF, ESQ.
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK COUNSELORS OF AMERICA PC915 BROADWAY - 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL AND SYNTHETIC RESINS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF COSMETICS, DIAGNOSTIC REAGENT FOR IN VITRO LABORATORY USE, PLANT GROWTH REGULATOR FOR AGRICULTURAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 003 | TOILET SOAPS; PERFUMES; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CANDY, COSMETICS AND PERFUME; COSMETIC CREAMS - NAMELY, HAND, FACE AND BODY CREAMS; COSMETIC LOTIONS - NAMELY, HAND, FACE AND BODY LOTIONS; COSMETIC MILKS; NAMELY TOILET MILKS; LIPSTICK; EYE SHADOW; EYE LINER; MASCARA; EYE PENCILS; EYEBROW PAINT; LIP PENCILS; LOOSE POWDERS AND COMPACT POWDERS; NAIL CARE PRODUCTS NAMELY, NAIL ENAMEL, NAIL POLISH REMOVER AND NAIL MENDER KIT COMPRISING TOP COAT, BASE COAT, AND SPECIAL LACQUER TO RETAIN ENAMEL; PROTECTIVE SKIN BALMS AND OILS; BATH SALTS; BEAUTY MASKS; HAIR LOTIONS; DENTIFRICE DENTURE CLEANING PREPARATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | DENTAL AMALGAMS, BABY FOOD, PHARMACEUTICAL AND HYGIENIC PRODUCTS, VETERINARY PREPARATIONS, PESTICIDES FOR AGRICULTURAL AND DOMESTIC USES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SANOFI (S.A.)
- Other trademarks owned by SANOFI (S.A.)
- Other trademarks owned by SANOFI (S.A.)
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named SANOFI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 23, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |