Drawing for FRENCH LINE

USPTO serial 73647509

FRENCH LINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRENCH LINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARC E. BROWN

MARC E BROWN POMS, SMITH, LANDE & ROSE2121 AVE OF THE STARS, STE 1400LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-5010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PAPER GOODS AND PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY; TAPE AND WIRE BOOKBINDINGS; MOUNTED AND UNMOUNTED PHOTOGRAPHS, PHOTO ALBUMS, PHOTOENGRAVINGS, PHOTOGRAPHIC PRINTS; STATIONERY - NAMELY, BOXES, FOLDERS, WRITING PAPERS AND ENVELOPES, DESK TOP CABINETS; STATIONERY-TYPE PORTFOLIOS; ADHESIVES FOR STATIONERY OR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES; ARTISTS, DRAWING, AND PAINT BRUSHES, TYPEWRITERS, DATERS, STAPLERS, HOLE PUNCHES FOR PAPER, AND BINDING EQUIPMENT FOR REPORTS; PLASTIC FILM FOR WRAPPING, SHEETS AND LABELS FOR WRITING, PRINTING, MARKING, PACKAGING AND WRAPPING; PLAYING CARDS; PRINTER BLOCK, FONTS AND TYPEABANDONED
020SPORTING GOODS, NAMELY; EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING ACTION-TYPE TARGET GAMES, BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES, HAND-HELD MANIPULATION GAMES, PADDLE BALL GAMES, AND PARLOR GAMES; PIN-BALL TYPE GAME MACHINES; ANIMAL HUNTING LURE CALLS; PROMOTIONAL GAME CARDS; COIN AND NON-COIN OPERATED VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES; COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS AND DISCS; GAMING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, SPINNING WHEELS; TOYS, NAMELY; BABY MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, CHILDRENS' MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL PLUSH, SOFT-SCULPTURED, AND STUFFED FIGURES; CHRISTMAS TREE ARTIFICIAL DECORATIONS AND ORNAMENTSABANDONED
028TOYS AND SPORTING GOODS, NAMELY, GAMES, I.E., EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING ACTION-TYPE TARGET GAMES, BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES, HAND-HELD MANIPULATION GAMES, PADDLE BALL GAMES, PARLOR GAMES, PIN-BALL TYPE GAME MACHINES, ANIMAL HUNTING LURE CALLS, PROMOTIONAL GAME CARDS, COIN AND NON-COIN OPERATED VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES, COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS AND DISCS; GAMING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, SPINNING WHEELS; TOYS, I.E., BABY MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, CHILDREN'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL PLUSH, SOFT-SCULPTURED, STUFFED FIGURES; CHRISTMAS TREE ARTIFICIAL DECORATIONS AND ORNAMENTSABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 28, 1990EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jul 10, 1990CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Apr 16, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 15, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 31, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Aug 24, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 24, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 17, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 25, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 1989PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 17, 1988PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Oct 20, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 1988ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 11, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 4, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance