USPTO serial 73647509
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LA DEFENSE, PARIS, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARC E. BROWN
MARC E BROWN POMS, SMITH, LANDE & ROSE2121 AVE OF THE STARS, STE 1400LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-5010UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PAPER GOODS AND PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY; TAPE AND WIRE BOOKBINDINGS; MOUNTED AND UNMOUNTED PHOTOGRAPHS, PHOTO ALBUMS, PHOTOENGRAVINGS, PHOTOGRAPHIC PRINTS; STATIONERY - NAMELY, BOXES, FOLDERS, WRITING PAPERS AND ENVELOPES, DESK TOP CABINETS; STATIONERY-TYPE PORTFOLIOS; ADHESIVES FOR STATIONERY OR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES; ARTISTS, DRAWING, AND PAINT BRUSHES, TYPEWRITERS, DATERS, STAPLERS, HOLE PUNCHES FOR PAPER, AND BINDING EQUIPMENT FOR REPORTS; PLASTIC FILM FOR WRAPPING, SHEETS AND LABELS FOR WRITING, PRINTING, MARKING, PACKAGING AND WRAPPING; PLAYING CARDS; PRINTER BLOCK, FONTS AND TYPE | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | SPORTING GOODS, NAMELY; EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING ACTION-TYPE TARGET GAMES, BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES, HAND-HELD MANIPULATION GAMES, PADDLE BALL GAMES, AND PARLOR GAMES; PIN-BALL TYPE GAME MACHINES; ANIMAL HUNTING LURE CALLS; PROMOTIONAL GAME CARDS; COIN AND NON-COIN OPERATED VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES; COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS AND DISCS; GAMING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, SPINNING WHEELS; TOYS, NAMELY; BABY MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, CHILDRENS' MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL PLUSH, SOFT-SCULPTURED, AND STUFFED FIGURES; CHRISTMAS TREE ARTIFICIAL DECORATIONS AND ORNAMENTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | TOYS AND SPORTING GOODS, NAMELY, GAMES, I.E., EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING ACTION-TYPE TARGET GAMES, BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES, HAND-HELD MANIPULATION GAMES, PADDLE BALL GAMES, PARLOR GAMES, PIN-BALL TYPE GAME MACHINES, ANIMAL HUNTING LURE CALLS, PROMOTIONAL GAME CARDS, COIN AND NON-COIN OPERATED VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES, COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS AND DISCS; GAMING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, SPINNING WHEELS; TOYS, I.E., BABY MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, CHILDREN'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL PLUSH, SOFT-SCULPTURED, STUFFED FIGURES; CHRISTMAS TREE ARTIFICIAL DECORATIONS AND ORNAMENTS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 1990 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 10, 1990 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 1989 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |