USPTO serial 73649598
PARTY LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARTY LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS W. SECREST
THOMAS W SECREST1023 N E 62ND STSEATTLE, WA 98115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES NAMELY; PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR A NUMBER OF PEOPLE TO SIMULTANEOUSLY COMMUNICATE WITH EACH OTHER BY TELEPHONE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 26, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 29, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 7, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |