Drawing for GLARE FREE

USPTO serial 73656216

GLARE FREE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1500901Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 16, 1988
Examiner
HINES PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLARE FREE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HENRY R. LERNER

HENRY R LERNER LEVISOHN, NINER & LERNER535 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009OPHTHALMIC LENSESSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDApr 7, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 1994CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 4, 1994CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999
Jun 29, 1993PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Aug 16, 1988R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jun 6, 1988CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
May 16, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 7, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 6, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 1987ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 14, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 13, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance