USPTO serial 73664933
GONDOLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANNON, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GONDOLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B. GOLDEN, ESQ.
MICHAEL B GOLDEN ESQ HARTMAN & CRAVEN460 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CHEESE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 26, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 29, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |