USPTO serial 73665612
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
S-598 00 VIMMERBY, SE
S-598 00 VIMMERBY, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT J. SINGER
Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ULTRA-VIOLET LAMP ASSEMBLIES AND PLATFORMS AND CANOPIES EQUIPPED WITH ULTRA-VIOLET LAMPS USED IN TANNING THE PERSON, AND SUN LAMPS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |