USPTO serial 73666243
FRIMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABATE CANDICE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRIMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WITTENHEIM, FR
WITTENHEIM, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | MULTI-USE COOKERS UTILIZING WARM AIR HEATING FOR USE AS A HIGH PRODUCTIVITY DEEP FRYER, A LARGE CAPACITY SAUTE PAN, A RICE AND PASTA COOKER AND AN INDIRECT HEATING COOKER; RESERVE OIL CARTS WITH PUMPS AND FILTERS; COOKING TABLES COMPRISING A HEATING ELEMENT AND WORK SURFACE; AIR FILTERING AND PURIFYING UNITS ALL OF THE AFOREMENTIONED EQUIPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL USES SUCH AS IN RESTAURANTS AND BY CATERERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | BASKET CARRIER CARTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 9, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |